Monday, March 31, 2014

Truwire Lightning Cable to USB for Apple iPhone 5 / 5C / 5S, iPad Air, iPad mini, iPod Nano (7th generation) iPod touch (5th Generation) - Best Compatible Charger Cord for Data and Syncing - Guaranteed Wire to Work with iOS7 - Fits All Aftermarket Cases and Accessories - Long (3 ft. / 0.9 m) and Portable - Original 8 Pin connector on Lightning End - Fits All USB Car Chargers

Truwire Lightning Cable to USB for Apple iPhone 5 / 5C / 5S, iPad Air, iPad mini, iPod Nano (7th generation) iPod touch (5th Generation) – Best Compatible Charger Cord for Data and Syncing – Guaranteed Wire to Work with iOS7 – Fits All Aftermarket Cases and Accessories – Long (3 ft. / 0.9 m) and Portable – Original 8 Pin connector on Lightning End – Fits All USB Car Chargers


41KuxbtOccL. SL160



  • LIFETIME GUARANTEE! Thats Right the ONLY Hassle Free No Runaround on the Warranty…We Only Want Happy Customers! Buy Today and have a Cord that will have a warranty longer than your devises life!. Guaranteed to fit All Aftermarket Cases

  • SHIPS DIRECTLY FROM AMAZON’S WAREHOUSE, you will not have to wait 3 weeks for delivery to ship from China like some of our competitors

  • Original Quality iPhone Cable for iPhone 5, 5s, 5c, iPad Air, iPad Mini, iPod Nano, and iPod Touch

  • Truwire is 100% compatible with Apple Products, including all future firmware updates.

  • ON SALE NOW FOR A VERY LIMITED TIME!!!!!



THIS IS THE BEST LIGHTNING CABLE ON THE MARKET
Have You Bought Top Namebrand Lightning Cables Only to be Dissapointed?
- Did your cord just stop working after sometime or malfunctioned? – Bad cable design that wont fit your case or just broke after a short period of time? – Are you unsure that your cable is ACTUALLY GUARANTEED ?
TruWIRE the ONLY cable that will built to last!
- Only Top decoding chips and sheathing used to make these cables!



buynow big

List Price: $ 9.99


Price: $ 10.99



Truwire Lightning Cable to USB for Apple iPhone 5 / 5C / 5S, iPad Air, iPad mini, iPod Nano (7th generation) iPod touch (5th Generation) - Best Compatible Charger Cord for Data and Syncing - Guaranteed Wire to Work with iOS7 - Fits All Aftermarket Cases and Accessories - Long (3 ft. / 0.9 m) and Portable - Original 8 Pin connector on Lightning End - Fits All USB Car Chargers

Pecan , Carya illinoinensis ....#4

A few nice weight loss tips for women images I found:


Pecan , Carya illinoinensis ….#4
7365857856 6b762d8983
Image by Vietnam Plants & The USA. plants
Taken on June 11, 2012 in Waco city, Texas state, Southern of America.


Vietnamese named : Dẻ, Mạy Châu, Hồ Đào .

Common names : Pecan

Scientist name : Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch

Synonyms : Carya oliviformis (Michx. f.) Nutt.

Carya pecan (Marsh.) Engl. & Graebn.

Hicoria pecan (Marsh.) Britton

Family : Juglandaceae – Walnut family

Kingdom: Plantae – Plants

Subkingdom : Tracheobionta – Vascular plants

Superdivision: Spermatophyta – Seed plants

Division: Magnoliophyta – Flowering plants

Class: Magnoliopsida – Dicotyledons

Subclass: Hamamelididae

Order: Juglandales

Genus: Carya Nutt. – hickory

Species: Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch – pecan


**** www.botanyvn.com/cnt.asp?param=edir&v=Juglandaceae&am… : NÓI VỀ HỌ ỐC CHÓ

Juglandaceae A. Rich. ex Kunth 1824


Cây to thường vỏ nứt dọc. Lá kép lông chim lẻ 1 lần, không có lá kèm.


Cụm hoa đơn tính dạng đuôi sóc. Hoa đơn tính với các hoa cái có các lá hoa phát triển dạng lá nguyên xẻ 3 thuỳ. Hoa cái có bầu dưới, 1 ô, 1 noãn , vòi dính gốc vòi 2 – 4 cành.


Quả hạch khi chín nứt thành 3 – 4 mảnh hay quả bế có cánh


Thế giới có 8 chi, 70 loài, phân bố ở Chủ yếu là ôn đới và á nhiệt đới, bắc bán cầu, ít ở nhiệt đới và ôn đới Nam Mỹ.


Việt Nam có 6 chi, 10 loài.


Phân loại: Họ được chia làm 2 phân họ: Juglandoideae có 2 chi: Juglans và Carya và Oreomunneoideae có 6 chi: Pterocarya, Engelhardtia, Oreomunea, Platicarya, Alfaroa. Mối quan hệ của họ này chưa rõ ràng, một số cho rằng nó có quan hệ với họ Bồ hòn. Nó xuất phát từ họ Rhoipteleaceae, một họ đặc hữu của bắc Việt Nam và nam Trung Hoa. Nó phân biệt với Juglandaceae bởi hoa lưỡng tính và hoa cái, bầu trên, có lá kèm và quả có cánh.


Công dụng: Ăn quả (Juglans regia), lấy tinh dầu, lấy gỗ và làm cảnh.


____________________________________________________________


**** plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=cail2

**** www.wildflower.org/gallery/result.php?id_image=2266

**** www.floridata.com/ref/c/cary_ill.cfm

**** www.hear.org/starr/images/image/?q=110601-6044&o=plants

**** www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Carya+illinoinensis


**** en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan

The pecan ( /pɨˈkɑːn/, /pɨˈkæn/, or /ˈpiːkæn/), Carya illinoinensis, is a species of hickory, native to south-central North America, in Mexico from Coahuila south to Jalisco and Veracruz,[1][2] in the United States from southern Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana east to western Kentucky, southwestern Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, and western Tennessee, south through Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Florida, and west into New Mexico.

"Pecan" is from an Algonquian word, meaning a nut requiring a stone to crack


Growth

The pecan tree is a large deciduous tree, growing to 20–40 m (66–130 ft) in height, rarely to 44 m (144 ft);[2] taller trees to 50–55 m (160–180 ft) have been claimed but not verified. It typically has a spread of 12–23 m (39–75 ft) with a trunk up to 2 m (6.6 ft) diameter. A 10-year-old sapling will stand about 5 m (16 ft) tall. The leaves are alternate, 30–45 cm (12–18 in) long, and pinnate with 9–17 leaflets, each leaflet 5–12 cm (2.0–4.7 in) long and 2–6 cm (0.79–2.4 in) broad. The flowers are wind-pollinated, and monoecious, with staminate and pistillate catkins on the same tree; the male catkins are pendulous, up to 18 cm (7.1 in) long; the female catkins are small, with three to six flowers clustered together.


Male catkins in spring

A pecan, like the fruit of all other members of the hickory genus, is not truly a nut, but is technically a drupe, a fruit with a single stone or pit, surrounded by a husk. The husks are produced from the exocarp tissue of the flower, while the part known as the nut develops from the endocarp and contains the seed. The nut itself is dark brown, oval to oblong, 2.6–6 cm (1.0–2.4 in) long and 1.5–3 cm (0.59–1.2 in) broad. The outer husk is 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) thick, starts out green and turns brown at maturity, at which time it splits off in four sections to release the thin-shelled nut.[2][4][5][6]

The nuts of the pecan are edible, with a rich, buttery flavor. They can be eaten fresh or used in cooking, particularly in sweet desserts, but also in some savory dishes. One of the most common desserts with the pecan as a central ingredient is the pecan pie, a traditional southern U.S. recipe. Pecans are also a major ingredient in praline candy, most often associated with New Orleans.

In addition to the pecan nut, the wood is also used in making furniture and wood flooring, as well as flavoring fuel for smoking meats.


Cultivation


Pecans with and without shells


A large pecan tree in downtown Abilene, Texas

Pecans were one of the most recently domesticated major crops. Although wild pecans were well-known among the colonial Americans as a delicacy, the commercial growing of pecans in the United States did not begin until the 1880s.[8] Today, the U.S. produces between 80% and 95% of the world’s pecans, with an annual crop of 150–200 thousand tons [9] from more than 10 million trees.[10] The nut harvest for growers is typically around mid-October. Historically, the leading pecan-producing state in the U.S. has been Georgia, followed by Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma; they are also grown in Arizona, South Carolina and Hawaii. Outside the United States, pecans are grown in Australia, Brazil, China, Israel, Mexico, Peru and South Africa. They can be grown approximately from USDA hardiness zones 5 to 9, provided summers are also hot and humid.

Pecan trees may live and bear edible nuts for more than 300 years. They are mostly self-incompatible, because most cultivars, being clones derived from wild trees, show incomplete dichogamy. Generally, two or more trees of different cultivars must be present to pollinate each other.


Choosing cultivars can be a complex practice, based on the Alternate Bearing Index and their period of pollinating. Commercial planters are most concerned with the Alternate Bearing Index, which describes a cultivar’s likelihood to bear on an alternating years (index of 1.0 signifies highest likelihood of bearing little to nothing every other year).[11] The period of pollination groups all cultivars into two families: those that shed pollen before they can receive pollen (protandrous), and those that shed pollen after becoming receptive to pollen (protogynous).[12] Planting cultivars from both families within 250 feet is recommended for proper pollination.


Diseases

Main article: List of pecan diseases

In the southeastern United States, nickel deficiency in C. Illinoinensis produces a disorder called mouse-ear in trees fertilized with urea.[13] An enzyme within the leaves uses nickel during the conversion of urea to ammonia, and a deficiency results in the toxic accumulation of urea. Symptoms of mouse-ear include rounded or blunt leaflet tips which produces smaller leaflets, dwarfing of tree organs, poorly developed root systems, rosetting, delayed bud break, loss of apical dominance, and necrosis of leaflet tips. Mouse-ear can be treated with foliar sprays of nickel.

A similar condition results from a zinc deficiency, which also can be treated by foliar sprays


Nutrition

Pecans

Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)

Energy2,889 kJ (690 kcal)

Carbohydrates13.86

- Starch0.46

- Sugars3.97

- Dietary fiber9.6

Fat71.97

- saturated6.18

- monounsaturated40.801

- polyunsaturated21.614

Protein9.17

Water3.52

Vitamin A56 IU

- beta-carotene29 μg (0%)

- lutein and zeaxanthin17 μg

Thiamine (vit. B1)0.66 mg (57%)

Riboflavin (vit. B2).13 mg (11%)

Niacin (vit. B3)1.167 mg (8%)

Pantothenic acid (B5)0.863 mg (17%)

Vitamin B60.21 mg (16%)

Folate (vit. B9)22 μg (6%)

Vitamin C1.1 mg (1%)

Vitamin E1.4 mg (9%)

Vitamin K3.5 μg (3%)

Calcium70 mg (7%)

Iron2.53 mg (19%)

Magnesium121 mg (34%)

Manganese4.5 mg (214%)

Phosphorus277 mg (40%)

Potassium410 mg (9%)

Sodium0 mg (0%)

Zinc4.53 mg (48%)

Percentages are relative to US recommendations for adults.

Source: USDA Nutrient Database


Pecans are a good source of protein and unsaturated fats. Like walnuts (which pecans resemble), pecans are rich in omega-6 fatty acids, although pecans contain about half as much omega-6 as walnuts.

A diet rich in nuts can lower the risk of gallstones in women. The antioxidants and plant sterols found in pecans reduce high cholesterol by reducing the "bad" LDL cholesterol levels.

Clinical research published in the Journal of Nutrition (September 2001) found that eating about a handful of pecans each day may help lower cholesterol levels similar to what is often seen with cholesterol-lowering medications.[19] Research conducted at the University of Georgia has also confirmed that pecans contain plant sterols, which are known for their cholesterol-lowering ability.[20] Pecans may also play a role in neurological health. Eating pecans daily may delay age-related muscle nerve degeneration, according to a study conducted at the University of Massachusetts and published in Current Topics in Nutraceutical Research.

The Lazy Magnolia Brewing Company from Kiln, Mississippi has produced a variety of beer using pecans rather than hops.


Evolutionary development

The pecan, Carya illinoinensis, is a member of the Juglandaceae family. Juglandaceae are represented worldwide by between seven and 10 extant genera and more than 60 species. Most of these species are concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere of the New World, but can be found on every continent except for Antarctica. The first fossil examples of the family appear during the Cretaceous. Differentiation between the subfamilies of Engelhardioideae and Juglandioideae occurred during the early Paleogene, about 64 million years ago. Extant examples of Engelharioideae are generally tropical and evergreen, while those of Juglandioideae are deciduous and found in more temperate zones. The second major step in the development of the pecan was a change from wind-dispersed fruits to animal dispersion. This dispersal strategy coincides with the development of a husk around the fruit and a drastic change in the relative concentrations of fatty acids. The ratio of oleic to linoleic acids are inverted between wind- and animal-dispersed seeds.[22][23] Further differentiation from other species of Juglandaceae occurred about 44 million years ago during the Eocene. The fruits of the pecan genus Carya differ from those of the walnut genus Juglans only in the formation of the husk of the fruit. The husks of walnuts develop from the bracts, bracteoles, and sepals, or sepals only. The husks of pecans develop from the bracts and the bracteoles only


History

Before European settlement, pecans were widely consumed and traded by Native Americans. As a food source, pecans are a natural choice for preagricultural society. They can provide two to five times more calories per unit weight than wild game, and require no preparation. As a wild forage, the fruit of the previous growing season are commonly still edible when found on the ground. Hollow tree trunks, found in abundance in pecan stands, offer ideal storage of pecans by humans and squirrels alike.[10]

Pecans first became known to Europeans in the 16th century. The first Europeans to come into contact with pecans were Spanish explorers in what is now Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana. The genus Carya does not exist in the Old World. Because of their familiarity with the genus Juglans, these early explorers referred to the nuts as nogales and nueces, the Spanish terms for "walnut trees" and "fruit of the walnut." They noted the particularly thin shell and acorn-like shape of the fruit, indicating they were indeed referring to pecans.[10] The Spaniards brought the pecan into Europe, Asia, and Africa beginning in the 16th century. In 1792, William Bartram reported in his botanical book, Travels, a nut tree, Juglans exalata that some botanists today argue was the American pecan tree, but others argue was hickory, Carya ovata.[24] Pecan trees are native to the United States, and writing about the pecan tree goes back to the nation’s founders. Thomas Jefferson planted pecan trees, Carya illinoinensis (Illinois nuts), in his nut orchard at his home, Monticello, in Virginia. George Washington reported in his journal that Thomas Jefferson gave him "Illinois nuts", pecans, which George Washington then grew at Mount Vernon, his Virginia home.


Breeding and breeding programs

Active breeding and selection programs are carried out by USDA-ARS[25] with growing locations at Brownwood and College Station, Texas. While selection work has been done since the late 1800s, most acreage of pecans grown today are of older cultivars, such as ‘Stuart’, ‘Schley’, ‘Desirable’, with known flaws but also with known production potential. The long cycle time for pecan trees plus financial considerations dictate that new varieties go through an extensive vetting process before being widely planted. Numerous examples of varieties produce well in Texas, but fail in the Southeastern U.S. due to increased disease pressure. Selection programs are ongoing at the state level, with Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Florida, Missouri and others having trial plantings.

Varieties that are adapted from the southern tier of States up through some parts of Iowa and even into southern Canada are available from nurseries. Production potential drops significantly when planted further north than Tennessee. Most breeding efforts for northern-adapted varieties have not been on a large enough scale to significantly impact production. Varieties that are available and adapted (e.g., ‘Major’, ‘Martzahn’, ‘Witte’, ‘Greenriver’, and ‘Posey’) in zones 6 and further north are almost entirely selections from wild stands. A northern-adapted variety must be grafted onto a northern rootstock to avoid freeze damage.

The pecan is a 32-chromosome species, and can hybridize with other 32-chromosome members of the Carya genus, such as Carya ovata, Carya laciniosa, and Carya cordiformis. Most such hybrids are unproductive, though a few second-generation hybrids have potential for producing hickory-flavored nuts with pecan nut structure. Such hybrids are referred to as "hicans" to indicate their hybrid origin.


Symbolism

In 1906, Texas Governor James Stephen Hogg asked that a pecan tree be planted at his grave instead of a traditional headstone, requesting that the nuts be distributed throughout the state to make Texas a "Land of Trees".[9] His wish was carried out and this brought more attention to pecan trees. In 1919, the 36th Texas Legislature made the pecan tree the state tree of Texas.

In southeast Texas, the Texas Pecan Festival is celebrated every year. There is also an annual Pecan Festival in Colfax, Louisiana in the month of November.


Pecan , Carya illinoinensis ….#8
7180632313 ef1c79f5f7
Image by Vietnam Plants & The USA. plants
Taken on June 11, 2012 in Waco city, Texas state, Southern of America.


Vietnamese named : Dẻ, Mạy Châu, Hồ Đào .

Common names : Pecan

Scientist name : Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch

Synonyms : Carya oliviformis (Michx. f.) Nutt.

Carya pecan (Marsh.) Engl. & Graebn.

Hicoria pecan (Marsh.) Britton

Family : Juglandaceae – Walnut family

Kingdom: Plantae – Plants

Subkingdom : Tracheobionta – Vascular plants

Superdivision: Spermatophyta – Seed plants

Division: Magnoliophyta – Flowering plants

Class: Magnoliopsida – Dicotyledons

Subclass: Hamamelididae

Order: Juglandales

Genus: Carya Nutt. – hickory

Species: Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch – pecan


**** www.botanyvn.com/cnt.asp?param=edir&v=Juglandaceae&am… : NÓI VỀ HỌ ỐC CHÓ

Juglandaceae A. Rich. ex Kunth 1824


Cây to thường vỏ nứt dọc. Lá kép lông chim lẻ 1 lần, không có lá kèm.


Cụm hoa đơn tính dạng đuôi sóc. Hoa đơn tính với các hoa cái có các lá hoa phát triển dạng lá nguyên xẻ 3 thuỳ. Hoa cái có bầu dưới, 1 ô, 1 noãn , vòi dính gốc vòi 2 – 4 cành.


Quả hạch khi chín nứt thành 3 – 4 mảnh hay quả bế có cánh


Thế giới có 8 chi, 70 loài, phân bố ở Chủ yếu là ôn đới và á nhiệt đới, bắc bán cầu, ít ở nhiệt đới và ôn đới Nam Mỹ.


Việt Nam có 6 chi, 10 loài.


Phân loại: Họ được chia làm 2 phân họ: Juglandoideae có 2 chi: Juglans và Carya và Oreomunneoideae có 6 chi: Pterocarya, Engelhardtia, Oreomunea, Platicarya, Alfaroa. Mối quan hệ của họ này chưa rõ ràng, một số cho rằng nó có quan hệ với họ Bồ hòn. Nó xuất phát từ họ Rhoipteleaceae, một họ đặc hữu của bắc Việt Nam và nam Trung Hoa. Nó phân biệt với Juglandaceae bởi hoa lưỡng tính và hoa cái, bầu trên, có lá kèm và quả có cánh.


Công dụng: Ăn quả (Juglans regia), lấy tinh dầu, lấy gỗ và làm cảnh.


____________________________________________________________


**** plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=cail2

**** www.wildflower.org/gallery/result.php?id_image=2266

**** www.floridata.com/ref/c/cary_ill.cfm

**** www.hear.org/starr/images/image/?q=110601-6044&o=plants

**** www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Carya+illinoinensis


**** en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan

The pecan ( /pɨˈkɑːn/, /pɨˈkæn/, or /ˈpiːkæn/), Carya illinoinensis, is a species of hickory, native to south-central North America, in Mexico from Coahuila south to Jalisco and Veracruz,[1][2] in the United States from southern Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana east to western Kentucky, southwestern Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, and western Tennessee, south through Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Florida, and west into New Mexico.

"Pecan" is from an Algonquian word, meaning a nut requiring a stone to crack


Growth

The pecan tree is a large deciduous tree, growing to 20–40 m (66–130 ft) in height, rarely to 44 m (144 ft);[2] taller trees to 50–55 m (160–180 ft) have been claimed but not verified. It typically has a spread of 12–23 m (39–75 ft) with a trunk up to 2 m (6.6 ft) diameter. A 10-year-old sapling will stand about 5 m (16 ft) tall. The leaves are alternate, 30–45 cm (12–18 in) long, and pinnate with 9–17 leaflets, each leaflet 5–12 cm (2.0–4.7 in) long and 2–6 cm (0.79–2.4 in) broad. The flowers are wind-pollinated, and monoecious, with staminate and pistillate catkins on the same tree; the male catkins are pendulous, up to 18 cm (7.1 in) long; the female catkins are small, with three to six flowers clustered together.


Male catkins in spring

A pecan, like the fruit of all other members of the hickory genus, is not truly a nut, but is technically a drupe, a fruit with a single stone or pit, surrounded by a husk. The husks are produced from the exocarp tissue of the flower, while the part known as the nut develops from the endocarp and contains the seed. The nut itself is dark brown, oval to oblong, 2.6–6 cm (1.0–2.4 in) long and 1.5–3 cm (0.59–1.2 in) broad. The outer husk is 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) thick, starts out green and turns brown at maturity, at which time it splits off in four sections to release the thin-shelled nut.[2][4][5][6]

The nuts of the pecan are edible, with a rich, buttery flavor. They can be eaten fresh or used in cooking, particularly in sweet desserts, but also in some savory dishes. One of the most common desserts with the pecan as a central ingredient is the pecan pie, a traditional southern U.S. recipe. Pecans are also a major ingredient in praline candy, most often associated with New Orleans.

In addition to the pecan nut, the wood is also used in making furniture and wood flooring, as well as flavoring fuel for smoking meats.


Cultivation


Pecans with and without shells


A large pecan tree in downtown Abilene, Texas

Pecans were one of the most recently domesticated major crops. Although wild pecans were well-known among the colonial Americans as a delicacy, the commercial growing of pecans in the United States did not begin until the 1880s.[8] Today, the U.S. produces between 80% and 95% of the world’s pecans, with an annual crop of 150–200 thousand tons [9] from more than 10 million trees.[10] The nut harvest for growers is typically around mid-October. Historically, the leading pecan-producing state in the U.S. has been Georgia, followed by Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma; they are also grown in Arizona, South Carolina and Hawaii. Outside the United States, pecans are grown in Australia, Brazil, China, Israel, Mexico, Peru and South Africa. They can be grown approximately from USDA hardiness zones 5 to 9, provided summers are also hot and humid.

Pecan trees may live and bear edible nuts for more than 300 years. They are mostly self-incompatible, because most cultivars, being clones derived from wild trees, show incomplete dichogamy. Generally, two or more trees of different cultivars must be present to pollinate each other.


Choosing cultivars can be a complex practice, based on the Alternate Bearing Index and their period of pollinating. Commercial planters are most concerned with the Alternate Bearing Index, which describes a cultivar’s likelihood to bear on an alternating years (index of 1.0 signifies highest likelihood of bearing little to nothing every other year).[11] The period of pollination groups all cultivars into two families: those that shed pollen before they can receive pollen (protandrous), and those that shed pollen after becoming receptive to pollen (protogynous).[12] Planting cultivars from both families within 250 feet is recommended for proper pollination.


Diseases

Main article: List of pecan diseases

In the southeastern United States, nickel deficiency in C. Illinoinensis produces a disorder called mouse-ear in trees fertilized with urea.[13] An enzyme within the leaves uses nickel during the conversion of urea to ammonia, and a deficiency results in the toxic accumulation of urea. Symptoms of mouse-ear include rounded or blunt leaflet tips which produces smaller leaflets, dwarfing of tree organs, poorly developed root systems, rosetting, delayed bud break, loss of apical dominance, and necrosis of leaflet tips. Mouse-ear can be treated with foliar sprays of nickel.

A similar condition results from a zinc deficiency, which also can be treated by foliar sprays


Nutrition

Pecans

Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)

Energy2,889 kJ (690 kcal)

Carbohydrates13.86

- Starch0.46

- Sugars3.97

- Dietary fiber9.6

Fat71.97

- saturated6.18

- monounsaturated40.801

- polyunsaturated21.614

Protein9.17

Water3.52

Vitamin A56 IU

- beta-carotene29 μg (0%)

- lutein and zeaxanthin17 μg

Thiamine (vit. B1)0.66 mg (57%)

Riboflavin (vit. B2).13 mg (11%)

Niacin (vit. B3)1.167 mg (8%)

Pantothenic acid (B5)0.863 mg (17%)

Vitamin B60.21 mg (16%)

Folate (vit. B9)22 μg (6%)

Vitamin C1.1 mg (1%)

Vitamin E1.4 mg (9%)

Vitamin K3.5 μg (3%)

Calcium70 mg (7%)

Iron2.53 mg (19%)

Magnesium121 mg (34%)

Manganese4.5 mg (214%)

Phosphorus277 mg (40%)

Potassium410 mg (9%)

Sodium0 mg (0%)

Zinc4.53 mg (48%)

Percentages are relative to US recommendations for adults.

Source: USDA Nutrient Database


Pecans are a good source of protein and unsaturated fats. Like walnuts (which pecans resemble), pecans are rich in omega-6 fatty acids, although pecans contain about half as much omega-6 as walnuts.

A diet rich in nuts can lower the risk of gallstones in women. The antioxidants and plant sterols found in pecans reduce high cholesterol by reducing the "bad" LDL cholesterol levels.

Clinical research published in the Journal of Nutrition (September 2001) found that eating about a handful of pecans each day may help lower cholesterol levels similar to what is often seen with cholesterol-lowering medications.[19] Research conducted at the University of Georgia has also confirmed that pecans contain plant sterols, which are known for their cholesterol-lowering ability.[20] Pecans may also play a role in neurological health. Eating pecans daily may delay age-related muscle nerve degeneration, according to a study conducted at the University of Massachusetts and published in Current Topics in Nutraceutical Research.

The Lazy Magnolia Brewing Company from Kiln, Mississippi has produced a variety of beer using pecans rather than hops.


Evolutionary development

The pecan, Carya illinoinensis, is a member of the Juglandaceae family. Juglandaceae are represented worldwide by between seven and 10 extant genera and more than 60 species. Most of these species are concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere of the New World, but can be found on every continent except for Antarctica. The first fossil examples of the family appear during the Cretaceous. Differentiation between the subfamilies of Engelhardioideae and Juglandioideae occurred during the early Paleogene, about 64 million years ago. Extant examples of Engelharioideae are generally tropical and evergreen, while those of Juglandioideae are deciduous and found in more temperate zones. The second major step in the development of the pecan was a change from wind-dispersed fruits to animal dispersion. This dispersal strategy coincides with the development of a husk around the fruit and a drastic change in the relative concentrations of fatty acids. The ratio of oleic to linoleic acids are inverted between wind- and animal-dispersed seeds.[22][23] Further differentiation from other species of Juglandaceae occurred about 44 million years ago during the Eocene. The fruits of the pecan genus Carya differ from those of the walnut genus Juglans only in the formation of the husk of the fruit. The husks of walnuts develop from the bracts, bracteoles, and sepals, or sepals only. The husks of pecans develop from the bracts and the bracteoles only


History

Before European settlement, pecans were widely consumed and traded by Native Americans. As a food source, pecans are a natural choice for preagricultural society. They can provide two to five times more calories per unit weight than wild game, and require no preparation. As a wild forage, the fruit of the previous growing season are commonly still edible when found on the ground. Hollow tree trunks, found in abundance in pecan stands, offer ideal storage of pecans by humans and squirrels alike.[10]

Pecans first became known to Europeans in the 16th century. The first Europeans to come into contact with pecans were Spanish explorers in what is now Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana. The genus Carya does not exist in the Old World. Because of their familiarity with the genus Juglans, these early explorers referred to the nuts as nogales and nueces, the Spanish terms for "walnut trees" and "fruit of the walnut." They noted the particularly thin shell and acorn-like shape of the fruit, indicating they were indeed referring to pecans.[10] The Spaniards brought the pecan into Europe, Asia, and Africa beginning in the 16th century. In 1792, William Bartram reported in his botanical book, Travels, a nut tree, Juglans exalata that some botanists today argue was the American pecan tree, but others argue was hickory, Carya ovata.[24] Pecan trees are native to the United States, and writing about the pecan tree goes back to the nation’s founders. Thomas Jefferson planted pecan trees, Carya illinoinensis (Illinois nuts), in his nut orchard at his home, Monticello, in Virginia. George Washington reported in his journal that Thomas Jefferson gave him "Illinois nuts", pecans, which George Washington then grew at Mount Vernon, his Virginia home.


Breeding and breeding programs

Active breeding and selection programs are carried out by USDA-ARS[25] with growing locations at Brownwood and College Station, Texas. While selection work has been done since the late 1800s, most acreage of pecans grown today are of older cultivars, such as ‘Stuart’, ‘Schley’, ‘Desirable’, with known flaws but also with known production potential. The long cycle time for pecan trees plus financial considerations dictate that new varieties go through an extensive vetting process before being widely planted. Numerous examples of varieties produce well in Texas, but fail in the Southeastern U.S. due to increased disease pressure. Selection programs are ongoing at the state level, with Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Florida, Missouri and others having trial plantings.

Varieties that are adapted from the southern tier of States up through some parts of Iowa and even into southern Canada are available from nurseries. Production potential drops significantly when planted further north than Tennessee. Most breeding efforts for northern-adapted varieties have not been on a large enough scale to significantly impact production. Varieties that are available and adapted (e.g., ‘Major’, ‘Martzahn’, ‘Witte’, ‘Greenriver’, and ‘Posey’) in zones 6 and further north are almost entirely selections from wild stands. A northern-adapted variety must be grafted onto a northern rootstock to avoid freeze damage.

The pecan is a 32-chromosome species, and can hybridize with other 32-chromosome members of the Carya genus, such as Carya ovata, Carya laciniosa, and Carya cordiformis. Most such hybrids are unproductive, though a few second-generation hybrids have potential for producing hickory-flavored nuts with pecan nut structure. Such hybrids are referred to as "hicans" to indicate their hybrid origin.


Symbolism

In 1906, Texas Governor James Stephen Hogg asked that a pecan tree be planted at his grave instead of a traditional headstone, requesting that the nuts be distributed throughout the state to make Texas a "Land of Trees".[9] His wish was carried out and this brought more attention to pecan trees. In 1919, the 36th Texas Legislature made the pecan tree the state tree of Texas.

In southeast Texas, the Texas Pecan Festival is celebrated every year. There is also an annual Pecan Festival in Colfax, Louisiana in the month of November.


Pecan , Carya illinoinensis ….#5
7365858148 66a8c9c035
Image by Vietnam Plants & The USA. plants
Taken on June 11, 2012 in Waco city, Texas state, Southern of America.


Vietnamese named : Dẻ, Mạy Châu, Hồ Đào .

Common names : Pecan

Scientist name : Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch

Synonyms : Carya oliviformis (Michx. f.) Nutt.

Carya pecan (Marsh.) Engl. & Graebn.

Hicoria pecan (Marsh.) Britton

Family : Juglandaceae – Walnut family

Kingdom: Plantae – Plants

Subkingdom : Tracheobionta – Vascular plants

Superdivision: Spermatophyta – Seed plants

Division: Magnoliophyta – Flowering plants

Class: Magnoliopsida – Dicotyledons

Subclass: Hamamelididae

Order: Juglandales

Genus: Carya Nutt. – hickory

Species: Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch – pecan


**** www.botanyvn.com/cnt.asp?param=edir&v=Juglandaceae&am… : NÓI VỀ HỌ ỐC CHÓ

Juglandaceae A. Rich. ex Kunth 1824


Cây to thường vỏ nứt dọc. Lá kép lông chim lẻ 1 lần, không có lá kèm.


Cụm hoa đơn tính dạng đuôi sóc. Hoa đơn tính với các hoa cái có các lá hoa phát triển dạng lá nguyên xẻ 3 thuỳ. Hoa cái có bầu dưới, 1 ô, 1 noãn , vòi dính gốc vòi 2 – 4 cành.


Quả hạch khi chín nứt thành 3 – 4 mảnh hay quả bế có cánh


Thế giới có 8 chi, 70 loài, phân bố ở Chủ yếu là ôn đới và á nhiệt đới, bắc bán cầu, ít ở nhiệt đới và ôn đới Nam Mỹ.


Việt Nam có 6 chi, 10 loài.


Phân loại: Họ được chia làm 2 phân họ: Juglandoideae có 2 chi: Juglans và Carya và Oreomunneoideae có 6 chi: Pterocarya, Engelhardtia, Oreomunea, Platicarya, Alfaroa. Mối quan hệ của họ này chưa rõ ràng, một số cho rằng nó có quan hệ với họ Bồ hòn. Nó xuất phát từ họ Rhoipteleaceae, một họ đặc hữu của bắc Việt Nam và nam Trung Hoa. Nó phân biệt với Juglandaceae bởi hoa lưỡng tính và hoa cái, bầu trên, có lá kèm và quả có cánh.


Công dụng: Ăn quả (Juglans regia), lấy tinh dầu, lấy gỗ và làm cảnh.


____________________________________________________________


**** plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=cail2

**** www.wildflower.org/gallery/result.php?id_image=2266

**** www.floridata.com/ref/c/cary_ill.cfm

**** www.hear.org/starr/images/image/?q=110601-6044&o=plants

**** www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Carya+illinoinensis


**** en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan

The pecan ( /pɨˈkɑːn/, /pɨˈkæn/, or /ˈpiːkæn/), Carya illinoinensis, is a species of hickory, native to south-central North America, in Mexico from Coahuila south to Jalisco and Veracruz,[1][2] in the United States from southern Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana east to western Kentucky, southwestern Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, and western Tennessee, south through Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Florida, and west into New Mexico.

"Pecan" is from an Algonquian word, meaning a nut requiring a stone to crack


Growth

The pecan tree is a large deciduous tree, growing to 20–40 m (66–130 ft) in height, rarely to 44 m (144 ft);[2] taller trees to 50–55 m (160–180 ft) have been claimed but not verified. It typically has a spread of 12–23 m (39–75 ft) with a trunk up to 2 m (6.6 ft) diameter. A 10-year-old sapling will stand about 5 m (16 ft) tall. The leaves are alternate, 30–45 cm (12–18 in) long, and pinnate with 9–17 leaflets, each leaflet 5–12 cm (2.0–4.7 in) long and 2–6 cm (0.79–2.4 in) broad. The flowers are wind-pollinated, and monoecious, with staminate and pistillate catkins on the same tree; the male catkins are pendulous, up to 18 cm (7.1 in) long; the female catkins are small, with three to six flowers clustered together.


Male catkins in spring

A pecan, like the fruit of all other members of the hickory genus, is not truly a nut, but is technically a drupe, a fruit with a single stone or pit, surrounded by a husk. The husks are produced from the exocarp tissue of the flower, while the part known as the nut develops from the endocarp and contains the seed. The nut itself is dark brown, oval to oblong, 2.6–6 cm (1.0–2.4 in) long and 1.5–3 cm (0.59–1.2 in) broad. The outer husk is 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) thick, starts out green and turns brown at maturity, at which time it splits off in four sections to release the thin-shelled nut.[2][4][5][6]

The nuts of the pecan are edible, with a rich, buttery flavor. They can be eaten fresh or used in cooking, particularly in sweet desserts, but also in some savory dishes. One of the most common desserts with the pecan as a central ingredient is the pecan pie, a traditional southern U.S. recipe. Pecans are also a major ingredient in praline candy, most often associated with New Orleans.

In addition to the pecan nut, the wood is also used in making furniture and wood flooring, as well as flavoring fuel for smoking meats.


Cultivation


Pecans with and without shells


A large pecan tree in downtown Abilene, Texas

Pecans were one of the most recently domesticated major crops. Although wild pecans were well-known among the colonial Americans as a delicacy, the commercial growing of pecans in the United States did not begin until the 1880s.[8] Today, the U.S. produces between 80% and 95% of the world’s pecans, with an annual crop of 150–200 thousand tons [9] from more than 10 million trees.[10] The nut harvest for growers is typically around mid-October. Historically, the leading pecan-producing state in the U.S. has been Georgia, followed by Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma; they are also grown in Arizona, South Carolina and Hawaii. Outside the United States, pecans are grown in Australia, Brazil, China, Israel, Mexico, Peru and South Africa. They can be grown approximately from USDA hardiness zones 5 to 9, provided summers are also hot and humid.

Pecan trees may live and bear edible nuts for more than 300 years. They are mostly self-incompatible, because most cultivars, being clones derived from wild trees, show incomplete dichogamy. Generally, two or more trees of different cultivars must be present to pollinate each other.


Choosing cultivars can be a complex practice, based on the Alternate Bearing Index and their period of pollinating. Commercial planters are most concerned with the Alternate Bearing Index, which describes a cultivar’s likelihood to bear on an alternating years (index of 1.0 signifies highest likelihood of bearing little to nothing every other year).[11] The period of pollination groups all cultivars into two families: those that shed pollen before they can receive pollen (protandrous), and those that shed pollen after becoming receptive to pollen (protogynous).[12] Planting cultivars from both families within 250 feet is recommended for proper pollination.


Diseases

Main article: List of pecan diseases

In the southeastern United States, nickel deficiency in C. Illinoinensis produces a disorder called mouse-ear in trees fertilized with urea.[13] An enzyme within the leaves uses nickel during the conversion of urea to ammonia, and a deficiency results in the toxic accumulation of urea. Symptoms of mouse-ear include rounded or blunt leaflet tips which produces smaller leaflets, dwarfing of tree organs, poorly developed root systems, rosetting, delayed bud break, loss of apical dominance, and necrosis of leaflet tips. Mouse-ear can be treated with foliar sprays of nickel.

A similar condition results from a zinc deficiency, which also can be treated by foliar sprays


Nutrition

Pecans

Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)

Energy2,889 kJ (690 kcal)

Carbohydrates13.86

- Starch0.46

- Sugars3.97

- Dietary fiber9.6

Fat71.97

- saturated6.18

- monounsaturated40.801

- polyunsaturated21.614

Protein9.17

Water3.52

Vitamin A56 IU

- beta-carotene29 μg (0%)

- lutein and zeaxanthin17 μg

Thiamine (vit. B1)0.66 mg (57%)

Riboflavin (vit. B2).13 mg (11%)

Niacin (vit. B3)1.167 mg (8%)

Pantothenic acid (B5)0.863 mg (17%)

Vitamin B60.21 mg (16%)

Folate (vit. B9)22 μg (6%)

Vitamin C1.1 mg (1%)

Vitamin E1.4 mg (9%)

Vitamin K3.5 μg (3%)

Calcium70 mg (7%)

Iron2.53 mg (19%)

Magnesium121 mg (34%)

Manganese4.5 mg (214%)

Phosphorus277 mg (40%)

Potassium410 mg (9%)

Sodium0 mg (0%)

Zinc4.53 mg (48%)

Percentages are relative to US recommendations for adults.

Source: USDA Nutrient Database


Pecans are a good source of protein and unsaturated fats. Like walnuts (which pecans resemble), pecans are rich in omega-6 fatty acids, although pecans contain about half as much omega-6 as walnuts.

A diet rich in nuts can lower the risk of gallstones in women. The antioxidants and plant sterols found in pecans reduce high cholesterol by reducing the "bad" LDL cholesterol levels.

Clinical research published in the Journal of Nutrition (September 2001) found that eating about a handful of pecans each day may help lower cholesterol levels similar to what is often seen with cholesterol-lowering medications.[19] Research conducted at the University of Georgia has also confirmed that pecans contain plant sterols, which are known for their cholesterol-lowering ability.[20] Pecans may also play a role in neurological health. Eating pecans daily may delay age-related muscle nerve degeneration, according to a study conducted at the University of Massachusetts and published in Current Topics in Nutraceutical Research.

The Lazy Magnolia Brewing Company from Kiln, Mississippi has produced a variety of beer using pecans rather than hops.


Evolutionary development

The pecan, Carya illinoinensis, is a member of the Juglandaceae family. Juglandaceae are represented worldwide by between seven and 10 extant genera and more than 60 species. Most of these species are concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere of the New World, but can be found on every continent except for Antarctica. The first fossil examples of the family appear during the Cretaceous. Differentiation between the subfamilies of Engelhardioideae and Juglandioideae occurred during the early Paleogene, about 64 million years ago. Extant examples of Engelharioideae are generally tropical and evergreen, while those of Juglandioideae are deciduous and found in more temperate zones. The second major step in the development of the pecan was a change from wind-dispersed fruits to animal dispersion. This dispersal strategy coincides with the development of a husk around the fruit and a drastic change in the relative concentrations of fatty acids. The ratio of oleic to linoleic acids are inverted between wind- and animal-dispersed seeds.[22][23] Further differentiation from other species of Juglandaceae occurred about 44 million years ago during the Eocene. The fruits of the pecan genus Carya differ from those of the walnut genus Juglans only in the formation of the husk of the fruit. The husks of walnuts develop from the bracts, bracteoles, and sepals, or sepals only. The husks of pecans develop from the bracts and the bracteoles only


History

Before European settlement, pecans were widely consumed and traded by Native Americans. As a food source, pecans are a natural choice for preagricultural society. They can provide two to five times more calories per unit weight than wild game, and require no preparation. As a wild forage, the fruit of the previous growing season are commonly still edible when found on the ground. Hollow tree trunks, found in abundance in pecan stands, offer ideal storage of pecans by humans and squirrels alike.[10]

Pecans first became known to Europeans in the 16th century. The first Europeans to come into contact with pecans were Spanish explorers in what is now Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana. The genus Carya does not exist in the Old World. Because of their familiarity with the genus Juglans, these early explorers referred to the nuts as nogales and nueces, the Spanish terms for "walnut trees" and "fruit of the walnut." They noted the particularly thin shell and acorn-like shape of the fruit, indicating they were indeed referring to pecans.[10] The Spaniards brought the pecan into Europe, Asia, and Africa beginning in the 16th century. In 1792, William Bartram reported in his botanical book, Travels, a nut tree, Juglans exalata that some botanists today argue was the American pecan tree, but others argue was hickory, Carya ovata.[24] Pecan trees are native to the United States, and writing about the pecan tree goes back to the nation’s founders. Thomas Jefferson planted pecan trees, Carya illinoinensis (Illinois nuts), in his nut orchard at his home, Monticello, in Virginia. George Washington reported in his journal that Thomas Jefferson gave him "Illinois nuts", pecans, which George Washington then grew at Mount Vernon, his Virginia home.


Breeding and breeding programs

Active breeding and selection programs are carried out by USDA-ARS[25] with growing locations at Brownwood and College Station, Texas. While selection work has been done since the late 1800s, most acreage of pecans grown today are of older cultivars, such as ‘Stuart’, ‘Schley’, ‘Desirable’, with known flaws but also with known production potential. The long cycle time for pecan trees plus financial considerations dictate that new varieties go through an extensive vetting process before being widely planted. Numerous examples of varieties produce well in Texas, but fail in the Southeastern U.S. due to increased disease pressure. Selection programs are ongoing at the state level, with Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Florida, Missouri and others having trial plantings.

Varieties that are adapted from the southern tier of States up through some parts of Iowa and even into southern Canada are available from nurseries. Production potential drops significantly when planted further north than Tennessee. Most breeding efforts for northern-adapted varieties have not been on a large enough scale to significantly impact production. Varieties that are available and adapted (e.g., ‘Major’, ‘Martzahn’, ‘Witte’, ‘Greenriver’, and ‘Posey’) in zones 6 and further north are almost entirely selections from wild stands. A northern-adapted variety must be grafted onto a northern rootstock to avoid freeze damage.

The pecan is a 32-chromosome species, and can hybridize with other 32-chromosome members of the Carya genus, such as Carya ovata, Carya laciniosa, and Carya cordiformis. Most such hybrids are unproductive, though a few second-generation hybrids have potential for producing hickory-flavored nuts with pecan nut structure. Such hybrids are referred to as "hicans" to indicate their hybrid origin.


Symbolism

In 1906, Texas Governor James Stephen Hogg asked that a pecan tree be planted at his grave instead of a traditional headstone, requesting that the nuts be distributed throughout the state to make Texas a "Land of Trees".[9] His wish was carried out and this brought more attention to pecan trees. In 1919, the 36th Texas Legislature made the pecan tree the state tree of Texas.

In southeast Texas, the Texas Pecan Festival is celebrated every year. There is also an annual Pecan Festival in Colfax, Louisiana in the month of November.



Pecan , Carya illinoinensis ....#4

How to seo your website for free

Check out these HOW TO EARN MONEY ONLINE images:


How to seo your website for free
7460436094 2721ae52f4
Image by SEOPlanter


How to seo your website for beginners
7460435904 42d24310fd
Image by SEOPlanter



How to seo your website for free

Sunday, March 30, 2014

FOREX Best Selling Trading Robot - Trade Currency online 24 hours a day with the same system the Pros use to scalp the market.  Fully automated - No programming required - Plug & Trade. Make Money from home with No stress - Version 12, with News Filter, for true "Set it and Forget it" trading

FOREX Best Selling Trading Robot – Trade Currency online 24 hours a day with the same system the Pros use to scalp the market.  Fully automated - No programming required – Plug & Trade. Make Money from home with No stress – Version 12, with News Filter, for true “Set it and Forget it” trading


51WZtzS4GGL. SL160



  • Trading Robot identifies profitable opportunities and executes successful trades, completely on its own

  • Proven strategy maximizes profits and minimizes risk. Metatrader MT4 Expert Advisor

  • No emotions. Computers trade much better than humans. The Robot will improve your trading whether you are a novice or a pro

  • This easy-to-use software is a highly sophisticated trading system that can outperform any financial wizard on Wall Street. Complete with Money Management controls, to put your trading account on automatic cruise-control

  • Watching your trading robot make you money is just amazing. It will set you on your way to financial freedom


There is a lot of money to be made in currency trading.


Yet most traders lose money in the Forex market.

The reason is simple: human emotions get in the way of their strategies.


The mental battle between greed and fear is the killer.


“I sold too early” (fear), “the price reversed and turned my profits into losses” (greed), are some of the excuses that traders have for losing their shirt, even though they “knew” better.

There is a better way:


Banks and Hedge Funds managers pocket



buynow big

List Price: $ 235.00


Price: $ 145.00


Find More BEST WAY TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE Products



FOREX Best Selling Trading Robot - Trade Currency online 24 hours a day with the same system the Pros use to scalp the market.  Fully automated - No programming required - Plug & Trade. Make Money from home with No stress - Version 12, with News Filter, for true "Set it and Forget it" trading

Sensa Weight Loss System

Sensa Weight Loss System


31%2BoRpN1F2L. SL160

  • Sensa Weight-Loss System Starter Kit

  • sugar free

  • sodium free

  • calorie free


Sensa Weight-Loss System Starter Kit




buynow big


Price: $ 16.49

Provida Six Week Body Makeover Kit; Weight Loss Program


51J3yU2N0%2BL. SL160

  • Easy to follow and very flexible.

  • Doesn't imply starvation.

  • Easy home system workouts.

  • Lots of food combinations to choose for.

  • You can spice the foods, to your taste.


Michael Thurmond's Six Week Body Makeover kit DVD version from Provida. Here's what's in the kit: 1. Custom Eating Plan (several pages with a black binder to organize it all). 2. Infinite menu planner. 3. Dining out guide. 4. Makeover meals recipe cards. 5. Personalized 18-minute body scuplting program. 6. Body Sculpting Band. 7. DVD: Precision Body Sculpting. 8. CD: In Case of Emergency. 9. CD: The Science of Eating More and Exercising Less. 10. CD: Unleashing your Body's Fat-Burning Potential.




buynow big


Price: $ 93.98

Find More Weight Loss Programs Products



Sensa Weight Loss System

Dripfeed Cash - The Easy Way To Build A Secure And Regular Income Online + Big Bonus

Dripfeed Cash – The Easy Way To Build A Secure And Regular Income Online + Big Bonus


51wNiHINGxL. SL160



  • What Makes “Drip Feed Cash” Unique? How can Drip Feed Cash help me as opposed to other “similar” products? This is a fair question to ask-after all, the market is jammed full of different Gurus all promising you work for home riches and “autopilot income” everyday. With “Drip Feed Cash”…

  • Big Bonus + Exclusive Reseller License Included, & 60 Days Money Back Guarantee

  • Note : This Item will be shipped on a CD format that is viewable on your PC. They will not work on Mac. This item is NOT paper/print books, but they are eBooks in PDF format or audio (mp3 format) or video (mp4 format) and can be easily transferred to portable device.

  • 1. We show you exactly what you need to do before you can set up a profitable membership site. Miss this bit and your dead in the water 2. We show you why scalability is the key to success when it comes to membership sites. 3. You will discover the one element in your buyers mindset that you must get right to succeed in this business 4. What you must do to keep your members on board – so important but frequently overlooked. 5. How to get other people to sell memberships for you – so that you can spend more time developing new membership sites and BUILDING your business! 6. The secret of using a physical product to beat the competition in the market without sacrificing your profit margins! 7. How to make sure your site is profitable not just be providing the raw content, but by also following some simple steps to ensure your members are happy to stay!

  • Yes! You read that right! $14.99 for a complete guide to creating your own successful membership site that you can continue to promote without worrying about your cash flow! That’s $14.99 to have a fully written manual that explains the whole system for you, That’s $14.99 to have the confidence to set up your own membership site, even if you’ve NEVER created one before, That’s $14.99 to save yourself the embarassment of setting up a slopping membership that make people leave immediately, That’s $14.99 to save yourself the heartache and time of testing and refining to see what sort of membership site really works, That’s $14.99 to keep your cash-flowing rather than going stale and withering away!, That’s $14.99 to get personal insights and my experience in creating membership sites!, That’s $14.99 so you can safe sleep at night knowing that you’re getting a stable source of income!, That’s $14.99 to have your Master Resale Rights License, so you can resell this product and keep 100% profit for yourself !


The Secrets To Building A Secure And Regular Income Online!


Ever created your own product before, promoted it to your list, and even sent a bit of traffic, but were left wondering…

“WHY Do My Sales Dry Up?…

I’ve Done Everything I Need To Do, But The Sales Aren’t Coming In!…”

It’s Time You Learned The #1 Secret That’s Stopping You From Earning Money Month After Month After Month…

Blogging… affiliate marketing… adsense… CPA…. PPC… freelancing… they all are viable ways of gener



buynow big

Price: $ 14.99


Find More HOW TO EARN AN INCOME ONLINE Products



Dripfeed Cash - The Easy Way To Build A Secure And Regular Income Online + Big Bonus

Saturday, March 29, 2014

How to Make Money Selling Drugs

How to Make Money Selling Drugs


61%2BYpkcLRWL. SL160


A shockingly candid examination of how a street dealer can rise to cartel lord with relative ease, HOW TO MAKE MONEY SELLING DRUGS is an insider s guide to the violent but extremely lucrative drug industry. Told from the perspective of former drug dealers, and featuring interviews with rights advocates Russell Simmons, Susan Sarandon, and David Simon (creator of The Wire), the film gives you the lessons you need to start your own drug empire while exposing the corruption behind the war on dru



buynow big

List Price: $ 26.95


Price: $ 10.99


How to Make Money in Stocks Success Stories: New and Advanced Investors Share Their Winning Secrets


51mtiPuJTfL. SL160


Proven Methods for Stock Market SUCCESS! “Amy’s book is a treasure trove of success stories you should read carefully – each of these investors share what could help you find the top 2% of great stocks.”
—William J. O’Neil, Chairman & Founder of Investor’s Business Daily and author of How to Make Money in Stocks “All you need are one or two great stock in a year and you can achieve some outstanding results.”
—David Ryan, three-time U.S. Investing Champion Millions of investors around t



buynow big

List Price: $ 18.00


Price: $ 8.98



How to Make Money Selling Drugs

Wellness Small Breed Complete Health Healthy Weight Recipe, 4-Pound Bag

Wellness Small Breed Complete Health Healthy Weight Recipe, 4-Pound Bag


51pVhWOfyVL. SL160

  • Guaranteed levels of L-Carnitine helps utilize fat and support weight loss

  • Pea fiber helps naturally satisfy pets while suppressing hunger

  • Includes glucosamine and chondroitin to support overburdened hips & joints

  • Also great for Small Breed seniors with slowing metabolisms

  • No GMOs, Meat By-Products, Wheat, Corn, Soy, Artificial Colors, Flavors or Preservatives

  • Made with high quality meat, Deboned Turkey, Chicken Meal, Ground Brown Rice, Salmon Meal


Whether you are looking for a food for your new puppy or for your long time companion it is important to understand the benefits of feeding your dog the best recipe to meet his/her needs. Wellness Natural Food for Pets offers a wide variety of foods to meet the needs of different life-stages and special needs dogs. Wellness Small Breed Complete Health Adult Health Recipe is made with: Optimal Caloric Intake to Support Healthy Body Weight 4 Animal Protein Sources for High Energy Needs and L




buynow big


List Price: $ 17.99

Price: $ 15.10

Smoothie Recipes for Weight Loss - 30 Delicious Detox, Cleanse and Green Smoothie Diet Book


51zUBn2MsiL. SL160

Hi, my name is Troy Adashun.

I'm a fitness model, health freak, and long time Smoothie Enthusiast. I am passionate to share some of my favorite smoothie recipes of all time in this book.

Smoothies are one of the easiest and most convenient ways to get an abundance of vitamins, minerals and nutrients that will help you become the healthiest and most energetic you possible! The great thing about these smoothie recipes is that many contain both fruits and vegetables. This sh




buynow big


Price:

Find More Healthy Recipes For Weight Loss Products



Wellness Small Breed Complete Health Healthy Weight Recipe, 4-Pound Bag

Ebony magazine (November 2012) Special Edition/At Home With the Obamas-An Intimate Conversation With Our President + 30 Day Relationship Makeover + Make More Money-5 Tips From a Black Millionaire

Ebony magazine (November 2012) Special Edition/At Home With the Obamas-An Intimate Conversation With Our President + 30 Day Relationship Makeover + Make More Money-5 Tips From a Black Millionaire


51P38YILZML. SL160


Special Edition with the Obama’s



buynow big

Price: $ 1.75



Ebony magazine (November 2012) Special Edition/At Home With the Obamas-An Intimate Conversation With Our President + 30 Day Relationship Makeover + Make More Money-5 Tips From a Black Millionaire

Friday, March 28, 2014

Pharoah Is Snackfood

A few nice weight loss program images I found:


Pharoah Is Snackfood
5060968866 48af96ac35
Image by Joe Mud
A plastic box filled with self help audio cassettes, a Christian weight-loss program that I seen years ago in The Goodwill, I think. So horrifying I had to buy it. Half the cassettes are missing, but I haven’t listened to any of the ones that were left, as none of my current audio playback devices is backward compatible.


SCATOLOGIST
534286356 41530d25ec
Image by Lord Manley
A promotional shot for my Poo led weight loss programme which I thought I would share.


I just gained 30 pounds!
6522310397 8db4c3ba42
Image by elycefeliz
I recently started an exercise / weight loss program by Denise Austin, and was supposed to get weights to exercise with. I didn’t want to spend the money on weights, so I’ve been lifting library books – : )


Until Wednesday, when I walked by a dumpster and saw these weights sitting outside. I think someone was throwing them away, but left them outside in case anyone wanted them – good thinking, because I would not have gone dumpster-diving . . .


But I’m very pleased with my new weights – I just checked prices online, and each one costs about , so I just got a Christmas gift for the New Year!


I’m grateful for FREE stuff when I actually need it and will use it!


Gratitude Series 2012 – photo #7 – Vielmohls mersi (Alsatian)



Pharoah Is Snackfood

From Idea to Finished Product: Writing a Book that Will Sell Reviews

From Idea to Finished Product: Writing a Book that Will Sell


51GvDlTPMmL. SL160


If you’ve ever had desires to write a book but haven’t known where to start, this is the guide for you. From the initial idea, to research, to drafting, to editing, to finished product, this guide will show you how to craft something that is professional, clear, meaningful, interesting, and more importantly, worthy of making you money.



buynow big

Price:



From Idea to Finished Product: Writing a Book that Will Sell Reviews

Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract 1000mg (60% HCA). Top Rated Natural Fat Buster As Recommended On The Dr Oz Show For Weight Loss. Premium Formula With No Side Effects - See Our Reviews And Note Our 30 day Amazon MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE

Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract 1000mg (60% HCA). Top Rated Natural Fat Buster As Recommended On The Dr Oz Show For Weight Loss. Premium Formula With No Side Effects - See Our Reviews And Note Our 30 day Amazon MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE


413zffCwEUL. SL160

  • DISCOVER THE AMAZING SECRET THAT HAS ENABLED THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE, JUST LIKE YOU, TO CUT UNWANTED POUNDS... NATURALLY: Garcinia Cambogia Extract 1300mg (1) it boosts serotonin levels in the brain; thus preventing emotional eating; (2) It works well with hydroxytryptophan (5 HTP), a natural amino acid, that makes serotonin levels easily available. (3) It has helped many people lose weight three times faster than traditional methods.

  • WHO ELSE WANTS TO STOP FAT FORMATION? Hydroxycitric Acid (HCA) reduces BMI (body mass index), burns fat, and block fat from invading your body. Because of its properties Garcinia Cambogia Extract also protects against diseases caused by being overweight or obese. Our Garcinia Cambogia Extract 1300mg is the key to prevent fat formation in your body.

  • FINALLY YOU CAN EXPERIENCE THE POWER TO TRANSFORM FAT INTO ENERGY: (1) The liver works more efficiently at transforming fat into energy because of the HCA in Garcinia Cambogia Extract. (2) You feel less hungry as HCA triggers LEPTIN (a hormone) to suppress hunger. (3) You can enjoy life again because your body turns fat, and suppress hunger so that you can enjoy life again.

  • ADD PEACE OF MIND TO YOUR LIFE; BUY A PRODUCT MADE IN THE USA. Our Garcinia is 100% produced in the U. S. A. and prepared in our laboratory with the highest standards in the world. Studies show that taken over a period of 8 weeks it reduces body mass index and fat from the belly.

  • BUY 2 AND GET FREE SHIPPING.


Weight Loss Success with the new Garcinia Cambogia Extract by PolarisBrand!Dr. Oz called Garcinia Cambogia Extract "the Holy Grail of Weight Loss". He went on to say, "Garcinia Cambogia blocks the enzyme that converts the sugar into the fat that your fat cells will absorb. It effectively uncorks the pathway that allows you to turn sugar into energy. And by doing that your fat cells can begin to shrink out their material, and convert it into energy". On his show another expert said "IT'S BEEN SEE




buynow big


Price: $ 16.00


Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract 1000mg (60% HCA). Top Rated Natural Fat Buster As Recommended On The Dr Oz Show For Weight Loss. Premium Formula With No Side Effects - See Our Reviews And Note Our 30 day Amazon MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE

Anker® Astro 3E 10000mAh Portable Charger Dual USB External Battery Power Pack for iPhone 5S, 5C, 5, 4S, iPad Air, mini, Galaxy S5, S4, S3, Note 3, Nexus 4, HTC One, One 2 (M8), Motorola Droid, Moto X, PS Vita, Gopro, most Smartphones, Tablets and other USB-charged devices (Apple adapters - 30 pin and lightning, not included)

Anker® Astro 3E 10000mAh Portable Charger Dual USB External Battery Power Pack for iPhone 5S, 5C, 5, 4S, iPad Air, mini, Galaxy S5, S4, S3, Note 3, Nexus 4, HTC One, One 2 (M8), Motorola Droid, Moto X, PS Vita, Gopro, most Smartphones, Tablets and other USB-charged devices (Apple adapters – 30 pin and lightning, not included)


41Gh5%2BsJrOL. SL160



  • 10000mAh of capacity. Charges all iPhone four to five times, a Galaxy S3 thrice, or an iPad / iPad 2 once.

  • Charges one device at maximum speed or two at 3A total. Android 5V / 3A (max) port charges Android devices and iPhone with iOS 5 or higher at full speed, iPad with iOS 5 or 6 at 1.5A, or iPad with iOS 7 at 1A; Apple 5V / 3A (max) port charges iPhone at full speed or iPad at 1A (Android devices at 0.5A). Note: this product CANNOT charge Samsung or Asus tablets.

  • A lightweight, unassuming solution to life’s daily power needs (0.59in thick). LEDs display just how much juice you’ve got left. Reliable lithium polymer core ensures quality, supplying you with more than 500 charge cycles during the course of its life.

  • Input: 5V / 1.5A; Use a 1.5A adapter (not included) for fastest charge times (8 hours).

  • Package contents: Anker® Astro 3E External Battery, Micro USB wire, travel pouch, instruction manual


Capacity, charge speed, or portability? With the Anker® Astro 3E, you get all three. Who would’ve thought that 10000mAh could be so compatible, light, and sleek?

Four times the juice.
With 10000mAh of capacity, charge your iPhone 5 / 4 / 3GS / 3 four to five times (40 hours of talk time), your Galaxy S3 three times, or your iPad / iPad 2 once. That’s more than 400% the capacity of most smart phones.

Get powered up…fast.
Plug in one device for 3A of output or two for 3A tot



buynow big

Price: $ 39.99


Find More Make 1000 A Month In Your Spare Time Products



Anker® Astro 3E 10000mAh Portable Charger Dual USB External Battery Power Pack for iPhone 5S, 5C, 5, 4S, iPad Air, mini, Galaxy S5, S4, S3, Note 3, Nexus 4, HTC One, One 2 (M8), Motorola Droid, Moto X, PS Vita, Gopro, most Smartphones, Tablets and other USB-charged devices (Apple adapters - 30 pin and lightning, not included)

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Smart Diet Scale

George Anastaplo ~ Right of Revolution ~ RIP My Friend

A few nice actual legitimate work from home jobs images I found:


George Anastaplo ~ Right of Revolution ~ RIP My Friend
5956900622 bdfd3243c0
Image by Viewminder
Before I made the acquaintance of George Anastaplo I saw him walking down the street in Chicago’s Hyde Park neighborhood.


There was something about him that caught my eye… something about the way that he walked and the way that he smiled… there was something about his spirit… there was something that I wanted to capture.


George has what I like to call ‘The Magic Mojo.’


I wanted to pop him right there on the street but I was late in getting to a very special dinner with some great friends.


I had to let the urge go.


I regretted my artistic inaction the moment I passed him on the street there.


Fortunately the regret would be short lived.


In one of those funny little twists of fate that life seems to lay on me… when we got to the dinner George ended up being seated right next to me.


He’s a fascinating guy.


A great storyteller, I really enjoyed the conversation that we shared as we sat there at the table.


‘While most lawyers go through an entire career without getting the opportunity to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court, George Anastaplo did so without entering the legal profession—and then, he likes to say, he retired.’ ~ Maria Kantzavelos, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, April 25, 2011, page 1


George completed his undergraduate degree in only one year at the University of Chicago.


It took me longer than that to pay my overdue library fines from freshman year.


In 1951 he graduated at the top of his law school class.


I would have liked to have sat next to him.


In 1964 George completed his doctorate at the University of Chicago’s Committee on Social Thought.


Since then he’s written more than 20 books on a multitude of subjects.


"A longtime Loyola University Chicago School of Law professor who today teaches courses in constitutional law and jurisprudence, Anastaplo became an eclectic scholar and teacher" ~ Maria Kantzavelos


‘Fifty years ago Sunday, on April 24, 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered a decision that affirmed the decision of the Illinois Supreme Court to deny Anastaplo admission to the Illinois bar because he refused to answer questions asked by the bar’s character committee about political associations.’ ~ Maria Kantzavelos


When George graduated from law school and he interviewed for admission into the Illinois Bar Association he had to be questioned in front of the ‘character committee’ they asked ‘do you think a communist should be admitted into the bar of this state?’


George’s answer?


‘Well, why not?’


Then they asked George if he was now or was ever a member of the Communist Party.


George didn’t feel that he should answer that question and because of that conviction they wouldn’t give him admission into the Illinois Bar and he couldn’t practice law even though the dude graduated at the top of his class. Hmmmmph.


‘Had he gone along with the process, things could have turned out differently for Anastaplo, who was being considered for a position at one of the big law firms in town.’ ~ Maria Kantzavelos


But that didn’t stop the fiesty twenty five year old.


He fought over the next ten years, ultimately laying out his case in front of the United States Supreme Court.


He argued there as a lawyer without a license!


‘In 1954 petitioner, George Anastaplo, an instructor and research assistant at the University of Chicago, having previously passed his Illinois bar examinations, was denied admission to the bar of that State by the Illinois Supreme Court. The denial was based upon his refusal to answer questions of the Committee on Character and Fitness as to whether he was a member of the Communist Party.’ ~ 366 U.S. 82 IN RE ANASTAPLO


‘The ensuing lengthy proceedings before the Committee, at which Anastaplo was the only witness, are perhaps best described as a wide-ranging exchange between the Committee and Anastaplo in which the Committee sought to explore Anastaplo’s ability conscientiously to swear support of the Federal and State Constitutions, as required by the Illinois attorneys’ oath, and Anastaplo undertook to expound and defend, on historical and ideological premises, his abstract belief in the ‘right of revolution,’ and to resist, on grounds of asserted constitutional right and scruple, Committee questions which he deemed improper. The Committee already had before it uncontroverted evidence as to Anastaplo’s ‘good moral character,’ in the form of written statements or affidavits furnished by persons of standing acquainted with him, and the record on rehearing contains nothing which could properly be considered as reflecting adversely upon his character or reputation or on the sincerity of the beliefs he espoused before the Committee. Anastaplo persisted, however, in refusing to answer, among other inquiries, the Committee’s questions as to his possible membership in the Communist Party or in other allegedly related organizations. ~ 366 U.S. 82 IN RE ANASTAPLO


Thereafter the Committee, by a vote of 11 to 6, again declined to certify Anastaplo because of his refusal to answer such questions, the majority stating in its report to the Illinois Supreme Court:


‘his (Anastaplo’s) failure to reply, in our view, obstructs the lawful processes of the Committee, prevents inquiry into subjects which bear intimately upon the issue of character and fitness, such as loyalty to our basic institutions, belief in representative government and bona fides of the attorney’s oath and results in his failure to meet the burden of establishing that he possesses the good moral character and fitness to practice law, which are conditions to the granting of a license to practice law.


‘We draw no inference of disloyalty or subversion from applicant’s continued refusal to answer questions concerning Communist or other subversive affiliations. We do, however, hold that there is a strong public interest in our being free to question applicants for admission to the bar on their adherence to our basic institutions and form of government and that such public interest in the character of its attorneys overrides an applicant’s private interest in keeping such views to himself. By failing to respond to this higher public interest we hold that the applicant has obstructed the proper functions of the Committee. We cannot certify the applicant as worthy of the trust and confidence of the public when we do not know that he is so worthy and when he has prevented us from finding out.’


At the same time the full Committee acknowledged that Anastaplo ‘is well regarded by his academic associates, by professors who had taught him in school and by members of the Bar who know him personally’; that it had ‘not been supplied with any information by any third party which is derogatory to Anastaplo’s character or general reputation. ~ ~ 366 U.S. 82 IN RE ANASTAPLO


THE DISSENTING OPINION


‘United States Supreme Court


366 U.S. 82


IN RE ANASTAPLO


No. 58. Argued: December 14, 1960. — Decided: April 24, 1961.


CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.


Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice BRENNAN concur, dissenting.


The petitioner George Anastaplo has been denied the right to practice law in the State of Illinois for refusing to answer questions about his views and associations. I think this action by the State violated rights guaranteed to him by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The reasons which lead me to this conclusion are largely the same as those expressed in my dissenting opinion in Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 366 U.S. at page 56, 81 S.Ct. at page 1010. But this case provides such a striking illustration of the destruction that can be inflicted upon individual liberty when this Court fails to enforce the First Amendment to the full extent of its express and unequivocal terms that I think it deserves separate treatment.


The controversy began in November 1950, when Anastaplo, a student at the University of Chicago Law School, having two months previously successfully passed the Illinos Bar examination, appeared before the State’s Committee on Character and Fitness for the usual interview preliminary to admission to the Bar. The personal history form required by state law had been filled out and filed with the Committee prior to his appearance and showed that Anastaplo was an unusually worthy applicant for admission. His early life had been spent in a small town in southern Illinois where his parents, who had immigrated to this country from Greece before his birth, still resided. After having received his precollege education in the public schools of his home town, he had discontinued his education, at the age of eighteen, and joined the Air Force during the middle of World War II-flying as a navigator in every major theater of the military operations of that war. Upon receiving an honorable discharge in 1947, he had come to Chicago and resumed his education, obtaining his undergraduate degree at the University of Chicago and entering immediately into the study of law at the University of Chicago Law School. His record throughout his life, both as a student and as a citizen, was unblemished.


The personal history form thus did not contain so much as one statement of fact about Anastaplo’s past life or conduct that could have, in any way, cast doubt upon his fitness for admission to the Bar. It did, however, contain a statement of opinion which, in the minds of some of the members of the Committee at least, did cast such doubt and in that way served to touch off this controversy. This was a statement made by Anastaplo in response to the command of the personal history form: ‘State what you consider to be the principles underlying the Constitution of the United States.’ Anastaplo’s response to that command was as follows:


‘One principle consists of the doctrine of the separation of powers; thus, among the Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary are distributed various functions and powers in a manner designed to provide for a balance of power, thereby intending to prevent totally unrestrained action by any one branch of government. Another basic principle (and the most important) is that such government is constituted so as to secure certain inalienable rights, those rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness (and elements of these rights are explicitly set forth in such parts of the Constitution as the Bill of Rights.). And, of course, whenever the particular government in power becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it and thereupon to establish a new government. This is how I view the Constitution.’


When Anastaplo appeared before a two-man Subcommittee of the Committee on Character and Fitness, one of its members almost immediately engaged him in a discussion relating to the meaning of these italicized words which were substantially taken from that part of the Declaration of Independence set out below. This discussion soon developed into an argument as Anastaplo stood by his statement and insisted that if a government gets bad enough, the people have a ‘right of revolution.’ It was at this juncture in the proceedings that the other member of the Subcommittee interrupted with the question: ‘Are you a member of any organization that is listed on the Attorney General’s list, to your knowledge?’ And this question was followed up a few moments later with the question: ‘Are you a member of the Communist Party?’ A colloquy then ensued between Anastaplo and the two members of the Subcommittee as to the legitimacy of the questions being asked, Anastaplo insisting that these questions were not reasonably related to the Committee’s functions and that they violated his rights under the Constitution, and the members of the Subcommittee insisting that the questions were entirely legitimate.


The Subcommittee then refused to certify Anastaplo for admission to the Bar but, instead, set a further hearing on the matter before the full Committee. That next hearing, as well as all of the hearings that followed, have been little more than repetitions of the first. The rift between Anastaplo and the Committee has grown ever wider with each successive hearing. Anastaplo has stead-fastly refused to answer any questions put by the Committee which inquired into his political associations or religious beliefs. A majority of the members of the Committee, faced with this refusal, has grown more and more insistent that it has the right to force him to answer any question it sees fit to ask. The result has been a series of hearings in which questions have been put to Anastaplo with regard to his ‘possible’ association with scores of organizations, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Silver Shirts (an allegedly Fascist organization), every organization on the so-called Attorney General’s list, the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, and the Communist Party. At one point in the proceedings, at least two of the members of the Committee insisted that he tell the Committee whether he believes in a Supreme Being and one of these members stated that, as far as his vote was concerned, a man’s ‘belief in the Deity * * * has a substantial bearing upon his fitness to practice law.’


It is true, as the majority points out, that the Committee did not expressly rest its refusal to certify Anastaplo for admission to the Bar either upon his views on the ‘right of revolution,’ as that ‘right’ is defined in the Declaration of Independence, or upon his refusal to disclose his beliefs with regard to the existence of God, [4] or upon his refusals to disclose any of his political associations other than his ‘possible’ association with the Communist Party. But it certainly cannot be denied that the other questions were asked and, since we should not presume that these members of the Committee did not want answers to their questions, it seems certain that Anastaplo’s refusal to answer them must have had some influence upon the final outcome of the hearings. In any case, when the Committee did vote, 11-6, not to certify Anastaplo for admission, not one member who asked any question Anastaplo had refused to answer voted in his favor.


The reasons for Anastaplo’s position have been stated by him time and again-first, to the Committee and, later, in the briefs and oral arguments he presented in his own behalf, both before this Court and before the Supreme Court of Illinois. From a legal standpoint, his position throughout has been that the First Amendment gave him a right not to disclose his political associations or his religious beliefs to the Committee. But his decision to refuse to disclose these associations and beliefs went much deeper than a bare reliance upon what he considered to be his legal rights. The record shows that his refusal to answer the Committee’s question stemmed primarily from his belief that he had a duty, both to society and to the legal profession, not to submit to the demands of the Committee because he believed that the questions had been asked solely for the purpose of harassing him because he had expressed agreement with the assertion of the right of revolution against an evil government set out in the Declaration of Independence. His position was perhaps best stated before the Committee in his closing remarks at the final session:


‘It is time now to close. Differences between us remain. I leave to others the sometimes necessary but relatively easy task of praising Athens to Athenians. Besides, you should want no higher praise than what I have said about the contribution the bar can make to republican government. The bar deserves no higher praise until it makes that contribution. You should be grateful that I have not made a complete submission to you, even though I have cooperated as fully as good conscience permits. To the extent I have not submitted, to that extent have I contributed to the solution of one of the most pressing problems that you, as men devoted to character and fitness, must face. This is the problem of selecting the standards and methods the bar must employ if it is to help preserve and nourish that idealism, that vital interest in the problem of justice, that so often lies at the heart of the intelligent and sensitive law student’s choice of career. This is an idealism which so many things about the bar, and even about bar admission practices, discourage and make unfashionable to defend or retain. The worthiest men live where the rewards of virtue are greatest.


‘I leave with you men of Illinois the suggestion that you do yourselves and the bar the honor, as well as the service, of anticipating what I trust will be the judgment of our most thoughtful judges. I move therefore that you recommend to the Supreme Court of Illinois that I be admitted to the bar of this State. And I suggest that this recommendation be made retroactive to November 10, 1950 when a young Air Force veteran first was so foolish as to continue to serve his country by daring to defend against a committee on character and fitness the teaching of the Declaration of Independence on the right of revolution.’


The reasons for the Committee’s position are also clear. Its job, throughout these proceedings, has been to determine whether Anastaplo is possessed of the necessary good moral character to justify his admission to the Bar of Illinois. In that regard, the Committee has been given the benefit of voluminous affidavits from men of standing in their professions and in the community that Anastaplo is possessed of an unusually fine character. Dr. Alexander Meiklejohn, Professor of Philosophy, Emeritus, at the University of Wisconsin, for example, described Anastaplo as ‘intellectually able, a hard, thorough student and moved by high devotion to the principles of freedom and justice.’ Professor Malcolm P. Sharp of the University of Chicago Law School stated: ‘No question has ever been raised about his honesty or his integrity, and his general conduct, characterized by friendliness, quiet independence, industry and courage, is reflected in his reputation.’ Professor Roscoe T. Steffen of the University of Chicago Law School said: ‘I know of no one who doubts his honesty and integrity.’ Yves R. Simon, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Chicago, said: ‘I consider Anastaplo as a young man of the most distinguished and lofty moral character. Everybody respects him and likes him.’ Angelo G. Geocaris, a practicing attorney in the City of Chicago, said of Anastaplo: ‘His personal code of ethics is unexcelled by any practicing attorney I have met in the state of Illinois.’ Robert J. Coughlan, Division Director of a research project at the University of Chicago, said: ‘His honesty and integrity are, in my opinion, beyond question. I would highly recommend him without the slightest reservation for any position involving the highest or most sacred trust. The applicant is a rare man among us today: he has an inviolable sense of Honor in the great traditions of Greek culture and thought. If admitted to the American Bar, he could do nothing that would not reflect glory on that institution.’


These affidavits and many more like them were presented to the Committee. Most of the statements came from men who knew Anastaplo intimately on the University of Chicago campus where Anastaplo has remained throughout the proceedings here involved, working as a research assistant and as a lecturer in Liberal Arts and studying for an advanced degree in History and Social Sciences. Even at the present time, he is still there preparing his doctoral dissertation which, understandably enough, is tentatively entitled ‘The Historical and Philosophical Background of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.’


The record also shows that the Committee supplemented the information it had obtained about Anastaplo from these affidavits by conducting informal independent investigations into his character and reputation. It sent agents to Anastaplo’s home town in southern Illinois and they questioned the people who knew him there. Similar inquiries were made among those who knew him in Chicago. But these intensive investigations apparently failed to produce so much as one man in Chicago or in the whole State of Illinois who could say or would say, directly, indirectly or even by hearsay, one thing derogatory to the character, loyalty or reputation of George Anastaplo, and not one man could be found who would in any way link him with the Communist Party. This fact is particularly significant in view of the evidence in the record that the Committee had become acquainted with a person who apparently had been a member of a Communist Party cell on the University of Chicago campus and that this person was asked to and did identify for the Committee every member of the Party whom he knew.


In addition to the information it had obtained from the affidavits and from its independent investigations, the Committee had one more important source of information about Anastaplo’s character. It had the opportunity to observe the manner in which he conducted himself during the many hours of hearings before it. That manner, as revealed by the record before us and undenied by any findings of the Committee to the contrary, left absolutely nothing to be desired. Faced with a barrage of sometimes highly provocative and totally irrelevant questions from men openly hostile to his position, Anastaplo invariably responded with all the dignity and restraint attributed to him in the affidavits of his friends. Moreover, it is not amiss to say that he conducted himself in precisely the same manner during the oral argument he presented before this Court.


Thus, it is against the background of a mountain of evidence so favorable to Anastaplo that the word ‘overwhelming’ seems inadequate to describe it that the action of the Committee in refusing to certify Anastaplo as fit for admission to the Bar must be considered. The majority of the Committee rationalized its position on the ground that without answers to some of the questions it had asked, it could not conscientiously perform its duty of determining Anastaplo’s character and fitness to be a lawyer. A minority of the Committee described this explanation as ‘pure sophistry.’ And it is simply impossible to read this record without agreeing with the minority. For, it is difficult to see what possible relevancy answers to the questions could have had in the minds of these members of the Committee after they had received such completely overwhelming proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Anastaplo’s good character and staunch patriotism. I can think of no sound reason for further insistence upon these answers other than the very questionable, but very human, feeling that this young man should not be permitted to resist the Committee’s demands without being compelled to suffer for it in some way.


It is intimated that the Committee’s feeling of resentment might be assuaged and that Anastaplo might even be admitted to the Bar if he would only give in to the demands of the Committee and add the requested test oath to the already overwhelming proof he has submitted to establish his good character and patriotism. In this connection, the Court says: ‘We find nothing to suggest that he would not be admitted now if he decides to answer, assuming of course that no grounds justifying his exclusion from practice resulted. In short, petitioner holds the key to admission in his own hands.’ However well this familiar phrase may fit other cases, it does not fit this one. For the attitude of the Committee, as revealed by the transcript of its hearings, does not support a belief that Anastaplo can gain admission to the Illinois Bar merely by answering the Committee’s questions, whatever answers he should give. Indeed, the Committee’s own majority report discloses that Anastaplo’s belief in the ‘right of revolution’ was regarded as raising ‘a serious question’ in the minds of a majority of the Committee with regard to his fitness to practice law and that ‘certain’ members of that majority (how many, we cannot know) have already stated categorically that they will not vote to admit an applicant who expresses such views. Nor does the opinion of the Illinois Supreme Court indicate that Anastaplo ‘holds the key to admission in his own hands.’ Quite the contrary, that court’s opinion evidences an almost insuperable reluctance to upset the findings of the Committee. Certainly, that opinion contains nothing that even vaguely resembles the sort of implicit promise that would justify the belief asserted by the majority here. And, finally, I see nothing in the majority opinion of this Court, nor in the majority opinions in the companion cases decided today, that would justify a belief that this Court would unlock the door that blocks his admission to the Illinois Bar if Anastaplo produced the ‘key’ and the state authorities refused to use it.


The opinion of the majority already recognizes that there is not one scrap of evidence in the record before us ‘which could properly be considered as reflecting adversely upon his (Anastaplo’s) character or reputation or on the sincerity of the beliefs he espoused before the Committee,’ and that the Committee had not received any "information from any outside source which would cast any doubt on applicant’s loyalty or which would tend to connect him in any manner with any subversive group." The majority opinion even concedes that Anastaplo was correct in urging that the questions asked by the Committee impinged upon the freedoms of speech and association guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. But, the opinion then goes on to hold that Anastaplo can nonetheless be excluded from the Bar pursuant to ‘the State’s interest in having lawyers who are devoted to the law in its broadest sense .’ I cannot regard that holding, as applied to a man like Anastaplo, as in any way justified. Consider it, for example, in the context of the following remarks of Anastaplo to the Committee-remarks the sincerity of which the majority does not deny:


‘I speak of a need to remind the bar of its traditions and to keep alive the spirit of dignified but determined advocacy and opposition. This is not only for the good of the bar, of course, but also because of what the bar means to American republican government. The bar when it exercises self-control is in a peculiar position to mediate between popular passions and informed and principled men, thereby upholding republican government. Unless there is this mediation, intelligent and responsible government is unlikely. The bar, furthermore, is in a peculiar position to apply to our daily lives the constitutional principles which nourish for this country its inner life. Unless there is this nourishment, a just and humane people is impossible. The bar is, in short, in a position to train and lead by precept and example the American people.’


These are not the words of a man who lacks devotion to ‘the law in its broadest sense.’


The majority, apparently considering this fact irrelevant because the State might possibly have an interest in learning more about its Bar applicants, decides that Anastaplo can properly be denied admission to the Bar by purporting to ‘balance’ the interest of the State of Illinois in ‘having lawyers who are devoted to the law in its broadest sense’ against the interest of Anastaplo and the public in protecting the freedoms of the First Amendment, concluding, as it usually does when it engages in this process, that ‘on balance’ the interest of Illinois must prevail. If I had ever doubted that the ‘balancing test’ comes close to being a doctrine of governmental absolutism-that to ‘balance’ an interest in individual liberty means almost inevitably to destroy that liberty-those doubts would have been dissipated by this case. For this so-called ‘balancing test’-which, as applied to the First Amendment, means that the freedoms of speech, press, assembly, religion and petition can be repressed whenever there is a sufficient governmental interest in doing so-here proves pitifully and pathetically inadequate to cope with an invasion of individual liberty so plainly unjustified that even the majority apparently feels compelled expressly to disclaim ‘any view upon the wisdom of the State’s action.’


I, of course, wholeheartedly agree with the statement of the majority that this Court should not, merely on the ground that such action is unwise, interfere with governmental action that is within the constitutional powers of that government. But I am no less certain that this Court should not permit governmental action that plainly abridges constitutionally protected rights of the People merely because a majority believes that on ‘balance’ it is better, or ‘wiser,’ to abridge those rights than to leave them free. The inherent vice of the ‘balancing test’ is that it purports to do just that. In the context of its reliance upon the ‘balancing test,’ the Court’s disclaimer of ‘any view upon the wisdom of the State’s action’ here thus seems to me to be wholly inconsistent with the only ground upon which it has decided this case.


Nor can the majority escape from this inconsistency on the ground that the ‘balancing test’ deals only with the question of the importance of the existence of governmental power as a general matter without regard to the importance of its exercise in a particular case. For in Barenblatt v. United States the same majority made it clear that the ‘balancing test’ is to be applied to the facts of each particular case (360 U.S. 109, 79 S.Ct. 1093): ‘Where First Amendment rights are asserted to bar governmental interrogation resolution of the issue always involves a balancing by the courts of the competing private and public interests at stake in the particular circumstances shown.’ Thus the Court not only ‘balances’ the respective values of two competing policies as a general matter, but also ‘balances’ the wisdom of those policies in ‘the particular circumstances shown.’ Thus, the Court has reserved to itself the power to permit or deny abridgement of First Amendment freedoms according to its own view of whether repression or freedom is the wiser governmental policy under the circumstances of each case.


The effect of the Court’s ‘balancing’ here is that any State may now reject an applicant for admission to the Bar if he believes in the Declaration of Independence as strongly as Anastaplo and if he is willing to sacrifice his career and his means of livelihood in defense of the freedoms of the First Amendment. But the men who founded this country and wrote our Bill of Rights were strangers neither to a belief in the ‘right of revolution’ nor to the urgency of the need to be free from the control of government with regard to political beliefs and associations. Thomas Jefferson was not disclaiming a belief in the ‘right of revolution’ when he wrote the Declaration of Independence. And Patrick Henry was certainly not disclaiming such a belief when he declared in impassioned words that have come on down through the years: ‘Give me liberty or give me death.’ This country’s freedom was won by men who, whether they believed in it or not, certainly practiced revolution in the Revolutionary War.


Since the beginning of history there have been governments that have engaged in practices against the people so bad, so cruel, so unjust and so destructive of the individual dignity of men and women that the ‘right of revolution’ was all the people had left to free themselves. As simple illustrations, one government almost 2,000 years ago burned Christians upon fiery crosses and another government, during this very century, burned Jews in crematories. I venture the suggestion that there are countless multitudes in this country, and all over the world, who would join Anastaplo’s belief in the right of the people to resist by force tyrranical governments like those.


In saying what I have, it is to be borne in mind that Anastaplo has not indicated, even remotely, a belief that this country is an oppressive one in which the ‘right of revolution’ should be exercised. Quite the contrary, the entire course of his life, as disclosed by the record, has been one of devotion and service to his country-first, in his willingness to defend its security at the risk of his own life in time of war and, later, in his willingness to defend its freedoms at the risk of his professional career in time of peace. The one and only time in which he has come into conflict with the Government is when he refused to answer the questions put to him by the Committee about his beliefs and associations. And I think the record clearly shows that conflict resulted, not from any fear on Anastaplo’s part to divulge his own political activities, but from a sincere, and in my judgment correct, conviction that the preservation of this country’s freedom depends upon adherence to our Bill of Rights. The very most that can fairly be said against Anastaplo’s position in this entire matter is that he took too much of the responsibility of preserving that freedom upon himself.


This case illustrates to me the serious consequences to the Bar itself of not affording the full protections of the First Amendment to its applicants for admission. For this record shows that Anastaplo has many of the qualities that are needed in the American Bar. It shows, not only that Anastaplo has followed a high moral, ethical and patriotic course in all of the activities of his life, but also that he combines these more common virtues with the uncommon virtue of courage to stand by his principles at any cost. It is such men as these who have most greatly honored the profession of the law-men like Malsherbes, who, at the cost of his own life and the lives of his family, sprang unafraid to the defense of Louis XVI against the fanatical leaders of the Revolutionary government of France -men like Charles Evans Hughes, Sr., later Mr. Chief Justice Hughes, who stood up for the constitutional rights of socialists to be socialists and public officials despite the threats and clamorous protests of self-proclaimed superpatriots -men like Charles Evans Hughes, Jr., and John W. Davis, who, while against everything for which the Communists stood, strongly advised the Congress in 1948 that it would be unconstitutional to pass the law then proposed to outlaw the Communist Party -men like Lord Erskine, James Otis, Clarence Darrow, and the multitude of others who have dared to speak in defense of causes and clients without regard to personal danger to themselves. The legal profession will lose much of its nobility and its glory if it is not constantly replenished with lawyers like these. To force the Bar to become a group of thoroughly orthodox, time-serving, government-fearing individuals is to humiliate and degrade it.


But that is the present trend, not only in the legal profession but in almost every walk of life. Too many men are being driven to become government-fearing and time-serving because the Government is being permitted to strike out at those who are fearless enough to think as they please and say what they think. This trend must be halted if we are to keep faith with the Founders of our Nation and pass on to future generations of Americans the great heritage of freedom which they sacrificed so much to leave to us. The choice is clear to me. If we are to pass on that great heritage of freedom, we must return to the original language of the Bill of Rights. We must not be afraid to be free’


‘ if a government gets bad enough, the people have a ‘right of revolution.’ ~ George Anastaplo


That’s why I like you George… what you just said right up there… you’re a principled man and a patriot… you’re a fiesty guy indeed as the following exchange points out…


This is from the transcript of the committee questioning George…


‘Commissioner Mitchell: When you say ‘believe in revolution,’ you don’t limit that revolution to an overthrow of a particular political party or a political government by means of an election process or other political means?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: I mean actual use of force.


‘Commissioner Mitchell: You mean to go as far as necessary?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: As far as Washington did, for instance.


‘Commissioner Mitchell: So that would it be fair to say that you believe the end result would justify any means that were used?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: No, the means proportionate to the particular end in sight.


‘Commissioner Mitchell: Well, is there any difference from your answer and my question?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: Did you ask-


‘Commissioner Mitchell: I asked you whether you thought that you believe that if a change, or overthrow of the government were justified, that any means could be used to accomplish that end.


‘Mr. Anastaplo: Now, let’s say in this positive concrete situation-I am not quite sure what it means in abstract.


‘Commissioner Mitchell: I will ask you in detail. You believe that assuming the government should be overthrown, in your opinion, that you and others of like mind would be justified in raising a company of men with military equipment and proceed to take over the government of the United States, of the State of Illinois?


‘By shaking your head do you mean yes?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: If you get to the point where overthrow is necessary, then overthrow is justified. It just means that you overthrow the government by force.


‘Commissioner Mitchell: And would that also include in your mind justification for putting a spy into the administrative department, one or another of the administrative departments of the United States or the government of the State of Illinois?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: If you got to the point you think the government should be overthrown, I think that would be a legitimate means.


‘Commissioner Mitchell: There isn’t any difference in your mind in the propriety of using a gun or using a spy?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: I think spies have been used in quite honorable causes.


‘Commissioner Mitchell: Your answer is, you do think so?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: Yes.


‘Commissioner Baker: Let me ask you a question. Are you aware of the fact that the Department of Justice has a list of what are described as subversive organizations?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: Yes.


‘Commissioner Baker: Have you ever seen that list?


‘Mr. Anastaplo: Yes.


‘Commissioner Baker: Are you a member of any organization that is listed on the Attorney General’s list, to your knowledge? (No answer.) Just to keep you from having to work so hard mentally on it, what organizations-give me all the organizations you are affiliated with or are a member of. (No answer.) That oughtn’t to be too hard.


‘Mr. Anastaplo: Do you believe that is a legitimate question?


‘Commissioner Baker: Yes, I do. We are inquiring into not only your character, but your fitness, under Rule 58. We don’t compel you to answer it. Are you a member of the Communist Party?’


George lost the case at the US Supreme Court but it was his principled approach to not answering the question in the first place and his ten year battle to overcome the ramifications of that refusal that earned him the respect of many who respect a person who lives a principle centered life.


He never would practice law, but he would become a passionate and inspiring teacher according to many.


He’s been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize twelve times.


And they sat him down for dinner next to ‘Viewminder’ a street photographer… who was only nominated for the Peace Prize once… by himself.


Crowned ‘The Socrates of Chicago’ George has written more books than some of the people I know have read…


"He has written books and articles analyzing the influence of Greek literature on American politics, on the Thinker as Artist, and the Artist as Thinker, on the O. J. Simpson trial, on lights at Wrigley Field, on McCarthyism, on hate speech, on lawyers, on judges, on the Bible, on ethics, on Abraham Lincoln, on the remodeling of Soldier field, and I have only touched the surface of his eclecticism. ~ ‘George Anastaplo’ by Abner Mikva


George Anastaplo I admire you.


You saw something that was wrong and you refused to be a part of it…


Even if that meant it would create difficulty in your life and in your pursuit of the career that you studied so long and hard for.


You stood true to your convictions.


You stood up for what you believe in.


You never backed down.


You’re an inspiring man and a patriot George Anastaplo.


They outta give out a prize for that.


Faces on the street

Chicago 7.9.11

35mm 1.8 SOOC with a ping of contrast


7.20.11



George Anastaplo ~ Right of Revolution ~ RIP My Friend